From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 05:55:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 05:55:23 -0400 Received: from twilight.ucw.cz ([195.39.74.230]:60383 "EHLO twilight.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 05:55:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:58:18 +0200 From: Vojtech Pavlik To: David Woodhouse Cc: Russell King , Vojtech Pavlik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxconsole-dev@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [patch] Fix suspend of the kseriod thread Message-ID: <20020731115818.A26329@ucw.cz> References: <20020730225736.K7677@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20020730122638.A11153@ucw.cz> <20020730122918.A11248@ucw.cz> <20020730152255.A20071@ucw.cz> <20020730152342.B20071@ucw.cz> <20020730221722.A22761@ucw.cz> <20020730225736.K7677@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <9658.1028109354@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <9658.1028109354@redhat.com>; from dwmw2@infradead.org on Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 10:55:54AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 10:55:54AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > rmk@arm.linux.org.uk said: > > Isn't interruptible_sleep_on() taboo? > > With the demise of cli() and the continued removal of the BKL, all users of > sleep_on() are probably buggy. We should remove it completely. Ok. Is the use in drivers/input/serio.c buggy? What should be it replaced with? -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs