From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:39:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:39:31 -0400 Received: from h24-67-14-151.cg.shawcable.net ([24.67.14.151]:23548 "EHLO webber.adilger.int") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:39:28 -0400 From: Andreas Dilger Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 18:41:54 -0600 To: Daniel Phillips Cc: Andrew Morton , Lahti Oy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched.c Message-ID: <20020828004154.GS19435@clusterfs.com> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Phillips , Andrew Morton , Lahti Oy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <000b01c24df5$aacc7ed0$d20a5f0a@deldaran> <3D6BC685.216B5B67@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/0D35BED6 X-GPG-Fingerprint: 7A37 5D79 BF1B CECA D44F 8A29 A488 39F5 0D35 BED6 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Aug 28, 2002 02:13 +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Tuesday 27 August 2002 20:35, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Lahti Oy wrote: > > > - for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) > > > + for (i = NR_CPUS; i; i--) > > > sum += cpu_rq(i)->nr_running; > > > > Off-by-one there. You'd want > > > > for (i = NR_CPUS; --i >= 0; ) > > > > or something similarly foul ;) > > int i = NR_CPUS; > > while (--i) Actually, I prefer the following to avoid wrap-around conditions in strange circumstances (i.e. if 'i' is manipulated between setting and the while loop): while (i-- > 0) { ... } Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/