From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:02:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:02:08 -0400 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([195.224.96.167]:62984 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 20:02:07 -0400 Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 01:06:41 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Dave Kleikamp , JFS-Discussion , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OOPS:2.5.33] Re: [Jfs-discussion] crash with JFS assert Message-ID: <20020906010641.A24706@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Kleikamp , JFS-Discussion , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3D771308.6030009@hh59.org> <200209050755.06015.shaggy@austin.ibm.com> <20020906000040.GA269@prester.freenet.de> <20020906000250.GB269@prester.freenet.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020906000250.GB269@prester.freenet.de>; from axel@hh59.org on Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:02:50AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:02:50AM +0200, Axel Siebenwirth wrote: > Since I have once encountered an oops that was only caused when I had two > certain config options enabled, I though it would also be useful to attach > my .config. This is 2.5.33 + akpm's patchkit, right? CONFIG_PREEMPT worries me, although I wonder whether JFS might be affected by similar problem NFS is, although I can't see any relation.