From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 06:52:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 06:52:24 -0400 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:45326 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 06:52:24 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:57:15 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kostadin Karaivanov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: XFS? Message-ID: <20020913115715.A30472@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Kostadin Karaivanov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <007001c25b13$b4a89ad0$1504a8c0@larry2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <007001c25b13$b4a89ad0$1504a8c0@larry2>; from larry@minfin.government.bg on Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 01:52:50PM +0300 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 13, 2002 at 01:52:50PM +0300, Kostadin Karaivanov wrote: > LSM is mainstream now > OpenMosix si too intrusive (I think) as XFS _used_ to_ be_..... Mosix is more intrusive then XFS ever was. Not to mention it's written in an unportable way and integrated into the Linux enviroment very badly. It doesn't look like the maintainers aim for integration, and even if they did they have a long long way to get it polished up.