From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 23:52:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 23:52:53 -0400 Received: from mnh-1-28.mv.com ([207.22.10.60]:2310 "EHLO ccure.karaya.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 15 Sep 2002 23:52:53 -0400 Message-Id: <200209160455.XAA04265@ccure.karaya.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 To: Daniel Jacobowitz cc: Linus Torvalds , Daniel Phillips , Alan Cox , David Brownell , Matthew Dharm , Greg KH , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB changes for 2.5.34 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 15 Sep 2002 15:32:23 -0400." <20020915193223.GA22800@nevyn.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 23:55:54 -0500 From: Jeff Dike Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org dan@debian.org said: > I run into problems fairly often that I can't reproduce in UML - > timing sensitive, Timing works both ways. Maybe you run into a bug on native i386 that UML won't reproduce. Maybe UML will reproduce bugs you won't see on hardware. That doesn't help you track down a particular bug you're seeing on hardware, but as far as overall bug smashing goes, it looks like a wash to me. > hardware sensitive, etc. That's potentially fixable. UML has SCSI support now, with a USB driver in the works. Other hardware access is possible, too. > UML > also doesn't use a lot of the code under arch/i386/ (or didn't at > least) which makes debugging that code under UML a bit futile. Then we need to push code out from arch into the generic kernel. That's happening slowly, but there's a bunch more to go. Jeff