From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:59:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:59:51 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:25746 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Mon, 16 Sep 2002 14:59:50 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: James Cleverdon Reply-To: jamesclv@us.ibm.com Organization: IBM xSeries Linux Solutions To: Alan Cox , davej@suse.de (Dave Jones) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Summit patch for 2.5.34 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 12:03:21 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, torvalds@transmeta.com, alan@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com References: <200209161615.g8GGFqx10004@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <200209161615.g8GGFqx10004@devserv.devel.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200209161203.21815.jamesclv@us.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday 16 September 2002 09:15 am, Alan Cox wrote: > > - Is this the same summit code as is in 2.4-ac ? > > (Ie, the one that boots on non summit systems too) > > Yes It's the same, save for a few lines of code that use the local APIC's task priority HW to try for some better dynamic interrupt balancing. > > - I believe the way forward here is to work with James Bottomley, > > who has a nice abstraction of the areas your patch touches for > > his Voyager sub-architecture. > > For 2.5 maybe not for 2.4. Until Linus takes the subarch stuff the > if if if bits will just get uglier. As well as voyager there are at least > two more pending NUMA x86 platforms other than IBM summit > - I'll have to read up on James Bottomley's x86 subarch code. -- James Cleverdon IBM xSeries Linux Solutions {jamesclv(Unix, preferred), cleverdj(Notes)} at us dot ibm dot com