From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 13:39:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 13:39:46 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:30093 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 21 Sep 2002 13:39:45 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 10:38:15 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Erich Focht Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel , LSE , Ingo Molnar , Michael Hohnbaum Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler Message-ID: <20020921173815.GE28202@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Erich Focht , "Martin J. Bligh" , linux-kernel , LSE , Ingo Molnar , Michael Hohnbaum References: <598631797.1032601564@[10.10.2.3]> <600156739.1032603089@[10.10.2.3]> <200209211932.59871.efocht@ess.nec.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200209211932.59871.efocht@ess.nec.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 07:32:59PM +0200, Erich Focht wrote: > Might also be that the __node_distance matrix which you might use > by default is not optimal for NUMAQ. It is fine for our remote/local > latency ratio of 1.6. Yours is maybe an order of magnitude larger? > Try replacing: 15 -> 50, guess you don't go beyond 4 nodes now... I'm running with 8 over the weekend, and by and large we go to 16, though we rarely put all our eggs in one basket. I'll take it for a spin. Cheers, Bill