From: Erich Focht <efocht@ess.nec.de>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LSE <lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Michael Hohnbaum <hohnbaum@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 10:30:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209221030.32323.efocht@ess.nec.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020922080942.GF25605@holomorphy.com>
Bill,
would you please check the boot messages for the NUMA scheduler before
doing the run. Martin sent me an example where he has:
CPU pools : 1
pool 0 :0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
node level 0 : 10
pool_delay matrix:
129
which is clearly wrong. In that case we need to fix the cpu-pools setup
first.
Regards,
Erich
On Sunday 22 September 2002 10:09, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 09:46:05AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >> An old compile off 2.5.31-mm1 + extras (I don't have 37, but similar)
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 04:18:10PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > Some 8-quad numbers for 2.5.37 (virgin) follow.
>
> Okay, 2.5.37 virgin with overcommit_memory set to 1 this time.
> (compiles with -j256 seem to do better than -j32 or -j48, here is -j256):
>
> ... will follow up with 2.5.38-mm1 with and without NUMA sched, at
> least if the arrival rate of releases doesn't exceed the benchtime.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-22 8:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-21 9:59 [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler Erich Focht
2002-09-21 10:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] " Erich Focht
2002-09-21 15:55 ` [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] " Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-21 16:32 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-21 16:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-21 17:11 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-21 17:32 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-21 17:38 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-21 23:18 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-22 8:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-22 8:30 ` Erich Focht [this message]
2002-09-22 17:11 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-22 19:20 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-22 21:59 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-22 22:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-22 22:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-23 18:19 ` node affine NUMA scheduler: simple benchmark Erich Focht
2002-09-22 10:35 ` [Lse-tech] [PATCH 1/2] node affine NUMA scheduler Erich Focht
2002-09-22 10:45 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-22 14:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-23 18:38 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-23 18:47 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-24 21:04 ` Erich Focht
2002-09-24 21:17 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-22 15:52 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-22 19:24 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-24 23:59 ` Matthew Dobson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200209221030.32323.efocht@ess.nec.de \
--to=efocht@ess.nec.de \
--cc=hohnbaum@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).