From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 04:32:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 04:32:32 -0400 Received: from albireo.ucw.cz ([81.27.194.19]:24580 "EHLO albireo.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 04:32:32 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 10:37:46 +0200 From: Martin Mares To: "Mohamed Ghouse , Gurgaon" Cc: "Linux-Kernel (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Interrupt Sharing Message-ID: <20020925083746.GA845@ucw.cz> References: <5F0021EEA434D511BE7300D0B7B6AB53050A4C9D@mail2.ggn.hcltech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5F0021EEA434D511BE7300D0B7B6AB53050A4C9D@mail2.ggn.hcltech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! > But what if two PCI Devices are sharing the same interrupt line? > Then how does the handler handle this? > Can you please explain this handling by the Kernel? All drivers register their interrupt handlers by calling request_irq(). When a shared interrupt arrives, all handlers for this interrupt are run and each of them polls the status register of the device it handles to see whether this device needs servicing. Have a nice fortnight -- Martin `MJ' Mares http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?