linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Theurer <habanero@us.ibm.com>
To: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.5.38-mm2 dbench $N times
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:51:58 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209251351.58355.habanero@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <297318451.1032908628@[10.10.2.3]>

On Wednesday 25 September 2002 1:03 am, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >> Not sure. This is boot bay SCSI crud, but single-disk FC looks
> >> *worse* for no obvious reason. Multiple disk tests do much better
> >> (about matching the el-scruffo PC numbers above).
> >
> > dbench 16 on that sort of machine is a memory bandwidth test.
> > And a dcache lock exerciser.  It basically doesn't touch the
> > disk.  Something very bad is happening.
>
> Does dbench have any sort of CPU locality between who read it
> into pagecache, and who read it out again? If not, you stand
> 7/8 chance of being on the wrong node, and getting 1/20 of the
> mem bandwidth ....

Pretty sure each dbench child does it's own write/read to only it's own data.  
There is no sharing that I am aware of between the processes.   How about 
running in tmpfs to avoid any disk IO at all?  

Also, what's the policy for home node assignment on fork?  Are all of these 
children getting the same home node assingnment??

-Andrew


  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-25 18:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-24 13:20 William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-24 17:47 ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-25  0:18   ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-25  0:25     ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-25  0:31     ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-25  0:39       ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-25  0:46         ` Andrew Morton
2002-09-25  1:08       ` Dave Hansen
2002-09-25  1:17         ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-25  6:03       ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-25 18:51         ` Andrew Theurer [this message]
2002-09-25 20:57           ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-25 21:05             ` Andrew Theurer
2002-09-25 23:57           ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200209251351.58355.habanero@us.ibm.com \
    --to=habanero@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --subject='Re: 2.5.38-mm2 dbench $N times' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).