linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Veltzer <mark@veltzer.org>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>,
	Mark Mielke <mark@mark.mielke.cc>,
	Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Svensson <petersv@psv.nu>
Subject: Re: Offtopic: (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 22:29:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200209251929.g8PJTPN05751@www.veltzer.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209251602170.22735-100000@imladris.surriel.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 25 September 2002 22:04, you wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Mark Mielke wrote:
> > I missed this one. Does this mean that fork() bombs will have limited
> > effect on root? :-)
>
> Indeed. A user can easily run 100 while(1) {} loops, but to the
> other users in the system it'll feel just like 1 loop...

Rik!

This is terrific!!! How come something like this was not merged in earlier 
?!? This seems like an absolute neccesity!!! I'm willing to test it if that 
is what is needed to get it merged. What does Linus and others feel about 
this and most importantly when will see it in ? (Hopefully in this 
development cycle).

	Regards,
	Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9kg6SxlxDIcceXTgRApApAKClB60zgDs0OB1ltb2ha0Lo8cescgCfTVE7
ZiNKbiTAN78LecVGt6/JzPU=
=/z0y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2002-09-25 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-22 18:55 [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 Peter Waechtler
2002-09-22 21:32 ` Larry McVoy
2002-09-23 10:05   ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-23 11:55     ` Peter Waechtler
2002-09-23 19:14       ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-29 23:26         ` Buddy Lumpkin
2002-09-30 14:54           ` Corey Minyard
2002-09-23 15:30     ` Larry McVoy
2002-09-23 19:44       ` Olivier Galibert
2002-09-23 19:48       ` Bill Davidsen
2002-09-23 20:32         ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-24  0:03           ` Andy Isaacson
2002-09-24  0:10             ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24  0:14               ` Andy Isaacson
2002-09-24  5:53             ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-24 20:34             ` David Schwartz
2002-09-24  7:12           ` Thunder from the hill
2002-09-24  7:30             ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 22:35         ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-23 19:59       ` Peter Waechtler
2002-09-23 20:36         ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-23 21:08           ` Peter Wächtler
2002-09-23 22:44             ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-23 23:01               ` Bill Huey
2002-09-23 23:11                 ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-24  0:21                   ` Bill Huey
2002-09-24  3:20                     ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-23 23:57           ` Andy Isaacson
2002-09-24  6:32             ` 1:1 threading vs. scheduler activations (was: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1) Ingo Molnar
2002-09-25  3:08               ` Bill Huey
2002-09-24 18:10             ` [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 Christoph Hellwig
2002-09-23 21:32       ` Bill Huey
2002-09-23 21:41       ` dean gaudet
2002-09-23 22:10         ` Bill Huey
2002-09-23 22:56         ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-24 10:02       ` Nikita Danilov
2002-09-23 21:22     ` Bill Huey
2002-09-23 21:03 ` Bill Huey
2002-09-24 12:03   ` Michael Sinz
2002-09-24 13:40     ` Peter Svensson
2002-09-24 14:20       ` Michael Sinz
2002-09-24 14:50         ` Offtopic: (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1) Peter Svensson
2002-09-24 15:19           ` Mark Veltzer
2002-09-24 17:29             ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-25 18:57               ` Mark Mielke
2002-09-25 19:04                 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-25 19:29                   ` Mark Veltzer [this message]
2002-09-25 19:23                     ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-24 16:31           ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-24 18:49             ` Michael Sinz
2002-09-24 19:12               ` PATCH: per user fair scheduler 2.4.19 (cleaned up, thanks hch) (was: Re: Offtopic: (was Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1)) Rik van Riel
2002-09-24 20:19 ` [ANNOUNCE] Native POSIX Thread Library 0.1 David Schwartz
2002-09-24 21:10   ` Chris Friesen
2002-09-24 21:22     ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-24 21:35       ` Roberto Peon
2002-09-24 21:35       ` Chris Friesen
2002-09-25 19:02     ` David Schwartz
2002-09-24 23:16   ` Peter Waechtler
2002-09-24 23:23     ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-25 19:05     ` David Schwartz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200209251929.g8PJTPN05751@www.veltzer.org \
    --to=mark@veltzer.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark@mark.mielke.cc \
    --cc=petersv@psv.nu \
    --cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).