From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:03:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:03:37 -0400 Received: from sproxy.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:45484 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 14:03:35 -0400 From: "Gerold J. Wucherpfennig" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Page table sharing Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:12:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200209252013.17714.gjwucherpfennig@gmx.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 What about page table sharing? Does anybody still care about this? The patch from Daniel Phillips (http://www.geocrawler.com/mail/msg.php3?msg_id=7855063&list=35) is a few month old and I can't see any progress. Sorry, I'm not a kernel expert, so I can't help. But page table sharing is still listed as betaware at the Linux Kernel 2.5 Status page (http://kernelnewbies.org/status/latest.html) and Page Table sharing isn't marked post Halloween. Some comments from Daniel Phillips or Dave McCracken? Gerold -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9kfyY53zyw+ONqrERAlvgAJ0RCNWZm7MEf7wGshZcE09oA5N7LQCfVuhq L/EX/pUmmjOQAEtXpaDm2yA= =QdO3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----