From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:53:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:53:41 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:26018 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:53:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:57:54 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Andrew Theurer Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.38-mm2 dbench $N times Message-ID: <20020925235754.GH3530@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Andrew Theurer , "Martin J. Bligh" , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3D9103EB.FC13A744@digeo.com> <297318451.1032908628@[10.10.2.3]> <200209251351.58355.habanero@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200209251351.58355.habanero@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 25 September 2002 1:03 am, Martin J. Bligh wrote: >> Does dbench have any sort of CPU locality between who read it >> into pagecache, and who read it out again? If not, you stand >> 7/8 chance of being on the wrong node, and getting 1/20 of the >> mem bandwidth .... On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 01:51:58PM -0500, Andrew Theurer wrote: > Pretty sure each dbench child does it's own write/read to only it's > own data. There is no sharing that I am aware of between the processes. > How about running in tmpfs to avoid any disk IO at all? tmpfs needs some fixes before it can be used for that. Hugh's working on it. Cheers, Bill