From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:51:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:51:40 -0400 Received: from blowme.phunnypharm.org ([65.207.35.140]:20490 "EHLO blowme.phunnypharm.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:51:39 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 21:56:45 -0400 From: Ben Collins To: Shanti Katta Cc: sparc-linux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Reg Sparc memory addresses Message-ID: <20020926015645.GE28289@phunnypharm.org> References: <1033005676.2723.5.camel@indus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1033005676.2723.5.camel@indus> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:01:15PM -0400, Shanti Katta wrote: > Hi, > I compiled user-mode-linux kernel on Ultrasparc with load address set to > 00000000e0000000. But, when I try to debug the kernel, it just says > cannot access memory at address 0xa00020b0. > This error message remains the same no matter what I change the load > address to. Can anyone guide me on valid memory addresses for userspace > on Sparc? and how much different is that from x86 architecture? You compiled it on ultrasparc, but I hope you compiled it as a "sparc" target and not "sparc64". I'm not familiar with how UML runs in user space, but I suspect it needs to think it is sparc and not sparc64 for it to run in 32bit sparc userspace (which is what ultrasparc runs at for most cases). -- Debian - http://www.debian.org/ Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/ Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/ Deqo - http://www.deqo.com/