From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:29:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:29:45 -0400 Received: from orion.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.90]:24586 "EHLO orion.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 26 Sep 2002 21:29:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2002 22:34:57 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 4/4] increase traffic on linux-kernel Message-ID: <20020927013457.GQ19921@conectiva.com.br> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3D928864.23666D93@digeo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:31:17AM +0000, Linus Torvalds escreveu: > In article <3D928864.23666D93@digeo.com>, > Andrew Morton wrote: > >Infrastructure to detect sleep-inside-spinlock bugs. Really only > >useful if compiled with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y. It prints out a whiny > >message and a stack backtrace if someone calls a function which might > >sleep from within an atomic region. > > This is in my BK tree now, along with Ingo's symbolic backtraces, which > makes it possibly less tedious to read the output. Wheee! Thanks a LOT for merging both. We'll have lots of fun with these ones while saving the old network protocols, that have lots of cases where we can see problems even without these tools, imagine with them in place 8) - Arnaldo