archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Milton Miller <>
To: (Alan Mayer)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cirqs on large machines
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 00:11:58 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

I looked at this patch again, and it makes no sense.

It would simply sum the unrelated IRQ % IRQvec irqs into a meaningless number.

If you don't want the space taken up in kstat, then you should expand on the
three ifdefs to something like this:

< #if !define(CONFIG_ARCH_S390) 
> #if !define(CONFIG_ARCH_S390) && !defined(CONFIG_YOUR_BIG_NUMA)

PS: sparc and sparc64 appear to have sparse irq space too: see __irq_itoa


      reply	other threads:[~2002-09-27  5:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-25 19:06 [PATCH] Cirqs on large machines Alan Mayer
2002-09-27  5:11 ` Milton Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).