From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:12:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:12:49 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:27591 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 12:12:48 -0400 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 18:17:22 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Alan Cox Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , linux-kernel mailing list , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 Message-ID: <20020929161722.GA22362@suse.de> References: <200209290114.15994.jdickens@ameritech.net> <20020929134620.GD2153@gallifrey> <20020929154254.GD1014@suse.de> <1033316509.13001.23.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1033316509.13001.23.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 29 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 16:42, Jens Axboe wrote: > > Has anyone actually sent patches to Linus removing LVM completely from > > 2.5 and adding the LVM2 device mapper? If I used LVM, I would have done > > exactly that long ago. Linus, what's your oppinion on this? > > I added LVM2 a while ago for my 2.4-ac tree and haven't looked back, its > much nicer code and its clean and easy to understand. I wouldnt > guarantee its bug free but its the kind of code where you can *find* a > bug if one turns up As far as I'm concerned that settles it for me. I'll check up on 2.5 lvm2 status tomorrow. -- Jens Axboe