linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: "Gustafson, Geoffrey R" <geoffrey.r.gustafson@intel.com>,
	"'Andy Pfiffer'" <andyp@osdl.org>,
	cgl_discussion@osdl.org, "Rhoads, Rob" <rob.rhoads@intel.com>,
	hardeneddrivers-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Hardeneddrivers-discuss] RE: [cgl_discussion] Some Initial Comments on DDH-Spec-0.5h.pdf
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 06:40:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020930064039.A159@toy.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D8FC2DA.3010107@pobox.com>; from jgarzik@pobox.com on Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 09:41:46PM -0400

Hi!

> > Most of what makes a 'good' driver is common for all purposes - things you
> > mention like don't make the system hang, don't cause fatal exceptions. But
> > there are some things that would be different between a desktop, embedded
> > system, enterprise server, or carrier server. For instance, when there is a
> > tradeoff between reliability and performance; when reliability is king, it
> > might be wise to do an insane amount of parameter checking to offset the
> > merest chance of an undetected bug crashing a system.
> 
> This is not a valid example.  We do not make tradeoffs between 
> performance and reliability.  Reliability _always_ comes first.  If it 
> did not, it's a bug.

No. We do run all drivers in *one* addressspace. That's bad for reliability.

-- 
Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt,
details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-01 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <EDC461A30AC4D511ADE10002A5072CAD01FD8CEA@orsmsx119.jf.intel.com>
2002-09-24  1:41 ` [Hardeneddrivers-discuss] RE: [cgl_discussion] Some Initial Comments on DDH-Spec-0.5h.pdf Jeff Garzik
2002-09-24  6:33   ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-09-24  7:01     ` Jeff Garzik
2002-09-25  3:54       ` Andre Hedrick
2002-09-25  7:12         ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-09-30  6:40   ` Pavel Machek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020930064039.A159@toy.ucw.cz \
    --to=pavel@suse.cz \
    --cc=andyp@osdl.org \
    --cc=cgl_discussion@osdl.org \
    --cc=geoffrey.r.gustafson@intel.com \
    --cc=hardeneddrivers-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rob.rhoads@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).