linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* make UML to compile in 2.5 bk-curr
@ 2002-09-30  8:12 Oleg Drokin
  2002-09-30  8:26 ` Oleg Drokin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Drokin @ 2002-09-30  8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jdike, user-mode-linux-user; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hello!

   After MIngo's patches named "atomic-thread-signals" and "tq_struct removal
   fixups.." were merged into bk current, patch below is necessary for
   UML to compile.

Bye,
    Oleg

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: make UML to compile in 2.5 bk-curr
  2002-09-30  8:12 make UML to compile in 2.5 bk-curr Oleg Drokin
@ 2002-09-30  8:26 ` Oleg Drokin
  2002-09-30 16:56   ` Jeff Dike
  2002-10-01 18:19   ` Jeff Dike
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Drokin @ 2002-09-30  8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jdike, user-mode-linux-user; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hello!

On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 12:12:48PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>    After MIngo's patches named "atomic-thread-signals" and "tq_struct removal
>    fixups.." were merged into bk current, patch below is necessary for
>    UML to compile.

And here is forgotten patch.


===== arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c 1.1 vs edited =====
--- 1.1/arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c	Fri Sep  6 21:29:28 2002
+++ edited/arch/um/drivers/chan_kern.c	Mon Sep 30 11:49:05 2002
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@
 		do {
 			if((tty != NULL) && 
 			   (tty->flip.count >= TTY_FLIPBUF_SIZE)){
-				queue_task(task, &tq_timer);
+				schedule_task(task);
 				goto out;
 			}
 			err = chan->ops->read(chan->fd, &c, chan->data);
===== arch/um/kernel/signal_kern.c 1.1 vs edited =====
--- 1.1/arch/um/kernel/signal_kern.c	Thu Sep 12 16:22:53 2002
+++ edited/arch/um/kernel/signal_kern.c	Mon Sep 30 11:56:06 2002
@@ -101,12 +101,12 @@
 		ka->sa.sa_handler = SIG_DFL;
 
 	if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER)) {
-		spin_lock_irq(&current->sigmask_lock);
+		spin_lock_irq(&current->sig->siglock);
 		sigorsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, 
 			  &ka->sa.sa_mask);
 		sigaddset(&current->blocked, signr);
 		recalc_sigpending();
-		spin_unlock_irq(&current->sigmask_lock);
+		spin_unlock_irq(&current->sig->siglock);
 	}
 
 	sp = PT_REGS_SP(regs);
@@ -188,11 +188,11 @@
 	sigset_t saveset;
 
 	mask &= _BLOCKABLE;
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sigmask_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&current->sig->siglock);
 	saveset = current->blocked;
 	siginitset(&current->blocked, mask);
 	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sigmask_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sig->siglock);
 
 	while (1) {
 		current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
@@ -214,11 +214,11 @@
 		return -EFAULT;
 	sigdelsetmask(&newset, ~_BLOCKABLE);
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sigmask_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&current->sig->siglock);
 	saveset = current->blocked;
 	current->blocked = newset;
 	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sigmask_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sig->siglock);
 
 	while (1) {
 		current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
@@ -234,13 +234,13 @@
 	void *mask = sp_to_mask(PT_REGS_SP(&regs));
 	int sig_size = (_NSIG_WORDS - 1) * sizeof(unsigned long);
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sigmask_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&current->sig->siglock);
 	copy_from_user(&current->blocked.sig[0], sc_sigmask(sc), 
 		       sizeof(current->blocked.sig[0]));
 	copy_from_user(&current->blocked.sig[1], mask, sig_size);
 	sigdelsetmask(&current->blocked, ~_BLOCKABLE);
 	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sigmask_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sig->siglock);
 	copy_sc_from_user(current->thread.regs.regs.sc, sc,
 			  &signal_frame_sc.arch);
 	return(PT_REGS_SYSCALL_RET(&current->thread.regs));
@@ -252,11 +252,11 @@
 	void *mask = sp_to_rt_mask(PT_REGS_SP(&regs));
 	int sig_size = _NSIG_WORDS * sizeof(unsigned long);
 
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sigmask_lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&current->sig->siglock);
 	copy_from_user(&current->blocked, mask, sig_size);
 	sigdelsetmask(&current->blocked, ~_BLOCKABLE);
 	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sigmask_lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sig->siglock);
 	copy_sc_from_user(current->thread.regs.regs.sc, sc,
 			  &signal_frame_sc.arch);
 	return(PT_REGS_SYSCALL_RET(&current->thread.regs));

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: make UML to compile in 2.5 bk-curr
  2002-09-30  8:26 ` Oleg Drokin
@ 2002-09-30 16:56   ` Jeff Dike
  2002-10-01 18:19   ` Jeff Dike
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2002-09-30 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleg Drokin; +Cc: user-mode-linux-user, linux-kernel

green@namesys.com said:
> And here is forgotten patch.

Great, thanks.

		Jeff


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: make UML to compile in 2.5 bk-curr
  2002-09-30  8:26 ` Oleg Drokin
  2002-09-30 16:56   ` Jeff Dike
@ 2002-10-01 18:19   ` Jeff Dike
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2002-10-01 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Oleg Drokin; +Cc: user-mode-linux-user, linux-kernel

green@namesys.com said:
> And here is forgotten patch. 

Applied, thanks.

		Jeff


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-10-01 17:12 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-09-30  8:12 make UML to compile in 2.5 bk-curr Oleg Drokin
2002-09-30  8:26 ` Oleg Drokin
2002-09-30 16:56   ` Jeff Dike
2002-10-01 18:19   ` Jeff Dike

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).