Minimum modutils version

Minimum modutils version

[John Levon]

Documentation/Changes claims modutils 2.4.2 is still acceptable. However
it seems at least 2.4.10 is needed for EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. What should
Changes be changed to ?

regards
john

-- 
"When your name is Winner, that's it. You don't need a nickname."
	- Loser Lane

Re: Minimum modutils version

[Adrian Bunk]

On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, John Levon wrote:

> Documentation/Changes claims modutils 2.4.2 is still acceptable. However
> it seems at least 2.4.10 is needed for EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL. What should
> Changes be changed to ?

Sounds reasonable.

Keith:
What's your opinion on the following patch for 2.4 (and a similar one for
2.5)?


--- linux-2.4.19/Documentation/Changes.old	2002-10-26 04:44:26.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.4.19/Documentation/Changes	2002-10-26 04:45:06.000000000 +0200
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
 o  Gnu make               3.77                    # make --version
 o  binutils               2.9.1.0.25              # ld -v
 o  util-linux             2.10o                   # fdformat --version
-o  modutils               2.4.2                   # insmod -V
+o  modutils               2.4.10                  # insmod -V
 o  e2fsprogs              1.25                    # tune2fs
 o  jfsutils               1.0.12                  # fsck.jfs -V
 o  reiserfsprogs          3.6.3                   # reiserfsck -V 2>&1|grep reiserfsprogs

> regards
> john

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed