From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:49:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:49:13 -0400 Received: from mail.cogenit.fr ([195.68.53.173]:13760 "EHLO cogenit.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Sep 2002 16:49:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 22:54:37 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Generic HDLC interface continued Message-ID: <20020930225437.A19967@se1.cogenit.fr> References: <20020928202138.A17244@se1.cogenit.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from khc@pm.waw.pl on Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 03:49:22PM +0200 X-Organisation: Marie's fan club - III Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Krzysztof Halasa : [...] > Not exactly. The caller always knows meaning of the returned value > (or it reports error etc). The caller doesn't just know size of the value > _in_advance_, as it isn't constant. Still, meaning of the variable portion > of the data is defined by the constant part. The caller doesn't know size in advance but he gets 'type' and 'size' at the same time. Why shouldn't 'size' be deduced from 'type' ? -- Ueimor