From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 07:20:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 07:20:43 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:10120 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 1 Oct 2002 07:20:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:25:23 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Alan Cox Cc: Mikael Pettersson , Linux-Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: v2.6 vs v3.0 Message-ID: <20021001112523.GP3867@suse.de> References: <20020929091229.GA1014@suse.de> <20021001062630.GM3867@suse.de> <15769.21706.618421.684462@kim.it.uu.se> <1033471870.20103.4.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1033471870.20103.4.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 01 2002, Alan Cox wrote: > > - Same ..._intr errors on my 486 with a qd6580 VLB controller. > > It also has, in post-2.5.36 kernels, an instant-reboot problem which > > occurs whenever I pass the ide0=qd65xx kernel option required to > > Seems to be specific to the 2.5.x version of the new ide so I guess its > a port error (or just bad luck it now breaks and was iffy before) ok, I'll try it in 2.5 then > > - My Intel AL440LX box (440LX chipset, 20G Quantum Fireball) worked > > brilliantly up to 2.5.36, but hangs *hard* with 2.5.39 as soon > > as I tar zxf the kernel source tarball. > > (May or may not be IDE. I'll try a minimal 2.5.39 tonight.) > > Thats PIIX, which should be the most boringly stable configuration of > the lot 8( There's no evidence that this is an ide error yet. I'd like to see some serial console or similar on that beast. I have no LX board here, but piix is rock solid. -- Jens Axboe