From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:22:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:22:48 -0400 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:22788 "HELO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 2 Oct 2002 18:22:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 00:29:58 +0200 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove LVM from 2.5 (resend) Message-ID: <20021002222958.GN1202@marowsky-bree.de> References: <20021001154808.GD126@suse.de> <20021001184225.GC29788@marowsky-bree.de> <1033520458.20284.46.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20021002042434.GA13971@think.thunk.org> <1033565669.23682.10.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20021002145434.GA1202@marowsky-bree.de> <1033578571.23758.32.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1033578571.23758.32.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2002-10-02T18:09:31, Alan Cox said: > > I'd be fine if someone said "We'll have EVMS, md and DM in 2.6 and then sort > > the mess in 2.7.", I'm just curious what the goal is. Right now, there's no > > working code in 2.5 nor a vision, which is obviously a major bug. > Look at history - if such a mess got in, it would never get sorted. Sounds like a good reason to do the cleanup immediately, then. Deleting code, I can do that ;-) Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée -- Principal Squirrel Research and Development, SuSE Linux AG ``Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me.'' --- Gregory F. Pfister