From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S262290AbSJEKY3>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 06:24:29 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S262291AbSJEKY2>; Sat, 5 Oct 2002 06:24:28 -0400
Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:6275 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S262290AbSJEKY2>;
	Sat, 5 Oct 2002 06:24:28 -0400
Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2002 03:23:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <20021005.032300.95062267.davem@redhat.com>
To: zippel@linux-m68k.org
Cc: gilbertd@treblig.org, lm@work.bitmover.com, tom_gall@mac.com,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New BK License Problem?
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0210051220300.338-100000@serv>
References: <20021004.170451.27090459.davem@redhat.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.44.0210051220300.338-100000@serv>
X-FalunGong: Information control.
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

   From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
   Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 12:26:49 +0200 (CEST)

   I don't care about bk and I wouldn't care about such questions either, if
   Larry wouldn't use every such opportunity to publicly jerk off about bk.

Pure comedy :-)