From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:51:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:51:32 -0400 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:8117 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Oct 2002 19:51:31 -0400 Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2002 16:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20021009.165003.103179484.davem@redhat.com> To: hps@intermeta.de Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Newsgroups: hometree.linux.kernel Subject: Re: BK is *evil* corporate software From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20021007204830.00b8b460@pop.gmx.net> <20021007143134.V14596@work.bitmover.com> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 23:34:25 +0000 (UTC) For the vast number of three to five developers enterprises, it's simply unreasonably priced. Larry is trying to tell you that BK isn't for you. It costs too much to support small numbers of groups which is why he can't price it the way you want.