From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 07:51:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 07:51:58 -0400 Received: from 205-158-62-105.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.105]:56269 "HELO ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 07:51:57 -0400 Message-ID: <20021013115743.11384.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: davidsen@tmr.com Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 19:57:43 +0800 Subject: Re:Benchmark results from resp1 trivial response time test X-Originating-Ip: 193.76.202.244 X-Originating-Server: ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, I think your benchmark is very intersting. Here goes my results: --- 2.4.19 --- Starting 1 CPU run with 251 MB RAM, minimum 5 data points at 20 sec intervals _____________ delay ms. ____________ Test low high median average S.D. ratio noload 119.653 124.207 119.786 120.644 0.002 1.000 smallwrite 121.051 190.696 144.469 152.062 0.031 1.260 largewrite 117.412 11871.027 1113.563 3362.302 4.870 27.870 cpuload 119.691 313.702 178.513 190.324 0.081 1.578 spawnload 114.624 243.985 119.747 154.604 0.057 1.281 8ctx-mem 652.737 7564.493 1234.938 2527.273 2.904 20.948 2ctx-mem 126.914 8428.021 620.418 2941.043 3.890 24.378 --- 2.5.41 --- Starting 1 CPU run with 250 MB RAM, minimum 5 data points at 20 sec intervals _____________ delay ms. ____________ Test low high median average S.D. ratio noload 113.607 114.030 113.774 113.783 0.000 1.000 smallwrite 117.882 526.275 121.038 208.868 0.178 1.836 largewrite 1674.216 88428.871 14794.752 27750.852 34.851 243.892 cpuload 104.225 158.400 104.478 115.269 0.024 1.013 spawnload 105.933 166.818 106.682 118.452 0.027 1.041 8ctx-mem 116.458 8893.645 120.670 1875.275 3.923 16.481 2ctx-mem 116.847 10174.152 121.309 2130.303 4.497 18.722 --- 2.5.42 --- Starting 1 CPU run with 250 MB RAM, minimum 5 data points at 20 sec intervals _____________ delay ms. ____________ Test low high median average S.D. ratio noload 113.676 113.948 113.737 113.774 0.000 1.000 smallwrite 115.352 189.983 119.500 141.645 0.036 1.245 largewrite 19012.080 45528.170 30311.890 31472.632 9.646 276.625 cpuload 103.328 1267.116 103.971 336.462 0.520 2.957 spawnload 105.196 167.400 105.787 117.983 0.028 1.037 8ctx-mem 121.166 8616.232 126.489 1824.054 3.797 16.032 2ctx-mem 115.162 10291.470 119.560 2152.930 4.550 18.923 --- 2.5.42-mm2 --- Starting 1 CPU run with 250 MB RAM, minimum 5 data points at 20 sec intervals _____________ delay ms. ____________ Test low high median average S.D. ratio noload 113.658 114.500 113.737 113.866 0.000 1.000 smallwrite 117.220 245.110 119.017 144.541 0.056 1.269 largewrite 114.841 181.420 118.746 131.568 0.028 1.155 cpuload 104.583 159.080 104.890 115.694 0.024 1.016 spawnload 108.790 166.141 109.655 120.698 0.025 1.060 8ctx-mem 114.430 8484.873 784.141 2066.476 3.604 18.148 2ctx-mem 121.388 8453.018 1414.443 2383.773 3.459 20.935 It seems that 2.5.42-mm2 is the "winner". Comments ? Paolo -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze