From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@csd.uu.se>
To: jcdutton@users.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel api for application profiling
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 15:28:44 +0200 (MET DST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200210131328.PAA14675@harpo.it.uu.se> (raw)
On Sun, 13 Oct 2002 21:08:30 +1000, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>I wish to be able to make a function call to start a timer, and then
>later on in the program stop the timer and therefore gather information
>about how long a particular routine took.
>The problem I have is that between start of timer and stop of timer, the
>kernel might task switch to another thread or process. I would like this
>kernel task switch to automatically stop the timer, and then restart it
>when I get CPU time returned. I cannot find any such API availiable
>currently in the linux kernel.
perfctr & PAPI support this. perfctr virtualises the TSC which
gives you high-res process times, and sampling is extremely
light-weight (no syscalls involved) so measuring small blocks
of code is feasible & accurate.
perfctr is a low-level Linux/x86-specific framework. PAPI is
a higher-level framework which supports a number of platforms.
PAPI uses perfctr on Linux/x86.
Both perfctr and PAPI also let you set up CPU performance
counters for counting other things than clock cycles.
See:
<http://www.csd.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/perfctr/>
<http://icl.cs.utk.edu/projects/papi/>
>Also, as an extension to this, it would be nice to know which other
>tasks happened during the task switch. The reason I would like this, is
>so that I can tell if the time was taken reading data off the hard disk
>or instead time spent by X displaying/transfering to screen the next
>video frame. If too much time is being spent doing a task like reading
>from the hard disk, I would need to look into reducing the latency of
>that task. This might also highlight buggy modules that take up too much
>of a time slice. I have seen some task switches take 800ms away from my
>audio out thread, and therefore causing underruns on the sound hardware,
>that then causes glitches in the perceived audio coming from the speakers.
This could perhaps be measured by programming a TSC-like event into
a performance counter and programming it to count in kernel-mode only.
P6, K7, and P4 should all support this.
And before people ask me: perfctr is not yet in official kernels,
I'm working on a cleaned up version for 2.5 submission RSN,
perfctr isn't easy for newbies to use due to HW-specific details,
but PAPI gives you a nice cosy high-level API.
/Mikael
next reply other threads:[~2002-10-13 13:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-13 13:28 Mikael Pettersson [this message]
2002-10-13 15:56 ` kernel api for application profiling John Levon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-13 22:17 Mikael Pettersson
2002-10-13 22:26 ` John Levon
2002-10-14 2:45 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2002-10-14 17:29 ` John Levon
2002-10-13 11:08 James Courtier-Dutton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200210131328.PAA14675@harpo.it.uu.se \
--to=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
--cc=jcdutton@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).