From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:19:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:19:33 -0400 Received: from 205-158-62-105.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.105]:18158 "HELO ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 13 Oct 2002 11:19:32 -0400 Message-ID: <20021013152510.13283.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 23:25:10 +0800 Subject: Re:Benchmark results from resp1 trivial response time test X-Originating-Ip: 193.76.202.244 X-Originating-Server: ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Bill Davidsen > On Sun, 13 Oct 2002, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > > Hi David, > thanks for the quick results, but it's Bill... Ops... sorry ;-) > > I think your benchmark is very intersting. > > Here goes my results: > > > It seems that 2.5.42-mm2 is the "winner". > > > Comments ? > > This mirrors my results, which is encouraging. The -mm2 patch seems to > improve performance under write pressure quite a bit. I am attaching Con > Kolivas' patch to 41-mm2 in case you missed it, as you can note from the > results on the website, it improves things beyond -mm2. If you decide to > run this version I'd like to see the result. I believe I had to use the > "-l" patch option to ignore blank mismatches to get this to work, and I've > cleaned up another mailing funny as well. Ok, thanks for the patch. I try it and I back with the result. Ciao, Paolo -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze