From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261757AbSJNP44>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:56:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261861AbSJNP44>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:56:56 -0400
Received: from carisma.slowglass.com ([195.224.96.167]:23310 "EHLO
	phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261757AbSJNP44>; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 11:56:56 -0400
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:02:48 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bitkeeper outragem, old and new
Message-ID: <20021014170248.A19897@infradead.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <E180rX3-0005dL-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <E180rX3-0005dL-00@fencepost.gnu.org>; from rms@gnu.org on Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 06:48:22PM -0400
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, Oct 13, 2002 at 06:48:22PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> If the latest outrage brings the spirit of the non-free Bitkeeper
> license into clear view, perhaps that will be enough to convince the
> developers of Linux to stop using Bitkeeper for Linux development.

It's still linuxand not GNU/Linux, so I'd suugest you troll with your
advice on some FSF list.