From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:31:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:31:34 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:17421 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 14 Oct 2002 22:31:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 04:37:23 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: "Feldman, Scott" Cc: "'Ben Greear'" , linux-kernel , "'netdev@oss.sgi.com'" Subject: Re: Update on e1000 troubles (over-heating!) Message-ID: <20021015043722.A9562@wotan.suse.de> References: <288F9BF66CD9D5118DF400508B68C44604758B78@orsmsx113.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <288F9BF66CD9D5118DF400508B68C44604758B78@orsmsx113.jf.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 07:20:04PM -0700, Feldman, Scott wrote: > > Here is the lspci information, both -x and -vv. This is with > > two of the e1000 single-port NICS side-by-side. I have also > > strapped a P-IV CPU fan on top of the two cards to blow some > > air over them....running tests now to see if that actually > > helps anything. If it does, I'll be sure to send you a picture :) > > Ben, I checked the datasheet for the part shown in the lspci dump, and it > shows an operating temperature of 0-55 degrees C. You said you measured 50 > degrees C, so you're within the safe range. Did the fans help? The thermometer he used likely showed a much lower temperature than what was actually on the die. 5-10 C more are not unlikely. It's hard to measure chip temperatures accurately without an on die thermal diode or special kit. So I would expect that when an external normal thermometer showed 50C it was already operating out of spec. -Andi