From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 04:39:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 04:39:32 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:31980 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 04:39:31 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:21:52 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Joe Thornber Cc: Austin Gonyou , linux-lvm@sistina.com, Alan Cox , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] 2.5 version of device mapper submission Message-ID: <20021015082152.GA4827@suse.de> References: <1034453946.15067.22.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <1034614756.29775.5.camel@UberGeek.coremetrics.com> <20021014175608.GA14963@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021014175608.GA14963@fib011235813.fsnet.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 14 2002, Joe Thornber wrote: > 10.patch > [Device-mapper] > Add call to blk_queue_bounce() at the beginning of the request function. What on earth for? I also see that you are setting BLK_BOUNCE_HIGH as the bounce limit unconditionally for your queue. Puzzled. When does dm even have to touch the data in the bio? -- Jens Axboe