From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S264720AbSJOTKC>; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:10:02 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S264722AbSJOTKC>; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:10:02 -0400
Received: from 205-158-62-105.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.105]:29858 "HELO
	ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S264720AbSJOTKB>; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 15:10:01 -0400
Message-ID: <20021015191545.20319.qmail@linuxmail.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404)
From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org>
To: <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 03:15:45 +0800
Subject: Re:Benchmark results from resp1 trivial response time test
X-Originating-Ip: 193.76.202.244
X-Originating-Server: ws4-4.us4.outblaze.com
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
> On Tue, 15 Oct 2002, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> 
> > Hi Bill,
> > I'm back with the results of others tests, here all my results:
> 
> Thanks, I'll cip them in the response, but this test sure does make some
> kernels unhappy, doesn't it? And the sad truth is that this isn't
> artifact, if you get a similar "real load" on the machine the response
> will be really unusable in real life.
Yeah, but it also means that 2.5.42-mm2 is the winner, and I have the same feeling just using it, so I think we'll see a 2.5.43 very responsive ;-)

Did you try 2.5.42-mm3 ?

Ciao,
         Paolo
-- 
Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org 


Powered by Outblaze