From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:57:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:57:19 -0500 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:25512 "EHLO outpost.ds9a.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:57:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 01:03:39 +0100 From: bert hubert To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Davide Libenzi , Hanna Linder , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-aio@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] epoll more scalable than poll Message-ID: <20021029000339.GA31212@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , Jamie Lokier , Davide Libenzi , Hanna Linder , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-aio@vger.kernel.org, lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net References: <20021028220809.GB27798@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20021028234434.GB18415@bjl1.asuk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021028234434.GB18415@bjl1.asuk.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:44:34PM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > :( I was hoping sys_epoll would be scalable without increasing the > number of system calls per event. I see only one call per event? sys_epoll_wait. Perhaps sys_epoll_ctl to register a new interest. Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO