From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 21:08:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 21:08:46 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:61710 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 9 Nov 2002 21:08:45 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 02:15:27 +0000 From: Matthew Wilcox To: "J.E.J. Bottomley" Cc: "Adam J. Richter" , andmike@us.ibm.com, greg@kroah.com, hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mochel@osdl.org, parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org, willy@debian.org Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] Untested port of parisc_device to generic device interface Message-ID: <20021110021527.Y12011@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> References: <200211100201.gAA21Uv04824@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <200211100201.gAA21Uv04824@localhost.localdomain>; from James.Bottomley@steeleye.com on Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 09:01:29PM -0500 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 09:01:29PM -0500, J.E.J. Bottomley wrote: > Actually, so would I. I can suspect why there might exist machines like this > (say the consistent attribute is settable at the pgd level) well, there's a limited amount of space available for consistent mappings on some machines. it's basically the same as the vmalloc space. i think the best way to handle this is simply to fail to initialise if you can't get the consistent memory you need. -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.