From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:30:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:30:43 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:19358 "EHLO mail.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 18:30:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:39:23 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Richard Stallman Cc: "Vlad@Vlad.geekizoid.com" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Nvidia and its choice to read the GPL "differently" Message-ID: <20030109233923.GI15590@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Richard Stallman , "Vlad@Vlad.geekizoid.com" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <010101c2b786$794d87a0$0200a8c0@wsl3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 06:14:20PM -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > GNU, the system we were developing, was most of the early GNU/Linux > system in 1992. GNU in 1992 included non-GNU packages such as X11, > and TeX. Wow. That might be one for the quotes file: "GNU ... was of the early GNU/Linux system. GNU ... included non-GNU" Well, that certainly explains a lot. If you define GNU as "anything which might be found on a Linux distro including non-GNU packages", your position starts to make a certain twisted sense. Only one problem with that: if it wasn't GNU, it wasn't GNU, which means, Richard, you are crackin' smoke and may need a vacation. 19 years of hard effort is a long time, have you considered retirement? You've certainly earned it. Oh, by the way, have you updated the GNU kernel pages to reflect the new proper name: Linux/Hurd? I'd really appreciate it if you could get to that. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm