From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:35:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:35:51 -0500 Received: from pD9E6AF2E.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.230.175.46]:2688 "EHLO fefe.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 21:35:50 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 03:44:35 +0100 From: Felix von Leitner To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: usb broken in 2.5? Message-ID: <20030114024435.GA1293@fefe.de> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In 2.5.57 USB does not work. The mainboard devices are still detected, and apparently also the USB devices are found, but then the USB code tries to remap them and fails. It tries again with 1.5 Mb/s and fails again. > usb_control/bulk_msg: timeout > usb.c: USB device not accepting new address=3 (error=-110) The same problem also happens with the WOLK kernel patch, which appears to also include a newer version of the USB code. This is an excerpt from /proc/pci: Bus 0, device 16, function 0: USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 128). IRQ 21. Master Capable. Latency=32. I/O at 0xdc00 [0xdc1f]. Bus 0, device 16, function 1: USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (#2) (rev 128). IRQ 21. Master Capable. Latency=32. I/O at 0xe000 [0xe01f]. Bus 0, device 16, function 2: USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (#3) (rev 128). IRQ 21. Master Capable. Latency=32. I/O at 0xe400 [0xe41f]. Bus 0, device 16, function 3: USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 130). IRQ 19. Master Capable. Latency=32. Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xe6033000 [0xe60330ff]. Any ideas? On 2.5 and WOLK the kernel also says that no IRQ is know and that it is using ACPI to route the IRQs. Felix