From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:15:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:15:16 -0500 Received: from phobos.hpl.hp.com ([192.6.19.124]:31430 "EHLO phobos.hpl.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:15:16 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 16:09:42 -0800 To: Andi Kleen Cc: Mikael Pettersson , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, discuss@x86-64.org Subject: Re: 32bit emulation of wireless ioctls Message-ID: <20030204000942.GB29628@bougret.hpl.hp.com> Reply-To: jt@hpl.hp.com References: <20030128212753.GA29191@wotan.suse.de> <15927.62893.336010.363817@harpo.it.uu.se> <20030129162824.GA4773@wotan.suse.de> <15934.49235.619101.789799@harpo.it.uu.se> <20030203194923.GA27997@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <20030203201255.GA32689@wotan.suse.de> <20030203214325.GA28330@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <20030203224619.GA6405@wotan.suse.de> <20030203231740.GA29267@bougret.hpl.hp.com> <20030203235150.GA22202@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030203235150.GA22202@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: HP Labs Palo Alto Address: HP Labs, 1U-17, 1501 Page Mill road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. E-mail: jt@hpl.hp.com From: Jean Tourrilhes X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:51:50AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > Short term I will just settle on getting that message away so that > RedHat users won't bother me anymore. Can you suggest a good way to > handle SIOCGIWNAME? Should I just make it return -EINVAL? Just return any error, all errors will be processed the same (and displayed to the user). Either make it convenient for you, or make it meaningful to the user. > -Andi Jean