From: uaca@alumni.uv.es
To: SA <bullet.train@ntlworld.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: interrupt latency k2.4 / i386?
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 20:10:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030207191017.GB20284@pusa.informat.uv.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200302071847.36646.bullet.train@ntlworld.com>
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 06:47:36PM +0000, SA wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> What latency should I expect for hardware interrupts under k2.4 / i386 ?
>
>
>
> ie how long should it take between the hardware signalling the interrupt and
> the interrupt handler being called?
I don't know the hardware part but it depends on how long interrupts are
being disabled (and that depend on the code you use in the kernel) and
that can be measured with akpm's timepeg+intlat patches
http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/#timepegs
I hope this helps
Ulisses
>
>
> I am wrting a driver which pace IO with interrupts, generating one interrupt
> for after every transfer is done. Looking at the hardware schematics the
> interrupts should occur virtually instantly after each transfer but the
> driver is waiting ~1ms/ interrupt.
>
> I can use polling instead with busy waits but this seems a bit wasteful.
>
>
> My interrupt is shared with my graphics card using the non-GPL nvidia driver -
> could this be responsible for the delay (any experience with this)?
>
> cat /proc/interrupts
> .....
> 10: 3028 XT-PIC eth0, VIA 82C686A
> 11: 1117037 XT-PIC nvidia, PI stage <-- my driver
> 12: 14776 XT-PIC usb-uhci, usb-uhci
> .....
>
> Thanks SA
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Debian GNU/Linux: a dream come true
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Computers are useless. They can only give answers." Pablo Picasso
---> Visita http://www.valux.org/ para saber acerca de la <---
---> Asociación Valenciana de Usuarios de Linux <---
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-07 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-07 18:47 interrupt latency k2.4 / i386? SA
2003-02-07 19:08 ` Richard B. Johnson
2003-02-07 19:10 ` uaca [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030207191017.GB20284@pusa.informat.uv.es \
--to=uaca@alumni.uv.es \
--cc=bullet.train@ntlworld.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).