From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 01:06:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 01:06:15 -0500 Received: from dp.samba.org ([66.70.73.150]:9634 "EHLO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 8 Feb 2003 01:06:13 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: Pavel Machek Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH][5/6] CPU Hotplug i386 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2003 18:03:41 BST." <20030207170030.GA2054@zaurus.ucw.cz> Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2003 15:26:54 +1100 Message-Id: <20030208061555.0B9832C065@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In message <20030207170030.GA2054@zaurus.ucw.cz> you write: > Hi! > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG > > +static inline void maybe_play_dead(void) > > Maybe config_CPU_hotplug would be a better > name? Could well be, but currently it's entirely subsumed by the existing CONFIG_HOTPLUG option. Hope that clarifies! Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.