From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: maxk@qualcomm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:46:12 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030217.194612.131926469.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0301180439480.10820-100000@champ.qualcomm.com>
After talking to Alexey, I don't like this patch.
The new module subsystem was supposed to deal with things
like this cleanly, and this patch is merely a hack to cover
up for it's shortcomings.
To be honest, I'd rather just disallow module unloading or
let them stay buggy than put this hack into the tree.
Special hacks are for 2.4.x where things like full cleanups
are not allowed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-18 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-26 8:11 [PATCH/RFC] New module refcounting for net_proto_family Max Krasnyansky
2003-01-02 11:43 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-01-03 8:24 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-20 3:22 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-01-21 11:03 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-21 19:42 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-01-21 19:36 ` David S. Miller
2003-02-07 9:48 ` David S. Miller
2003-02-07 23:34 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-02-08 8:44 ` David S. Miller
2003-02-18 3:46 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-02-18 18:50 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-02-18 21:09 ` Jean Tourrilhes
2003-02-19 3:54 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-19 7:04 ` David S. Miller
2003-02-19 18:03 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-02-19 20:31 ` Roman Zippel
2003-02-19 17:45 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-02-20 1:21 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-20 17:38 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-02-21 0:30 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-21 1:17 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-02-21 8:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-02-21 17:44 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-02-24 1:01 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-24 19:35 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-02-25 5:02 ` Rusty Russell
2003-02-26 20:21 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-01-07 9:21 ` David S. Miller
2003-01-09 20:45 ` Max Krasnyansky
2003-01-09 23:53 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-20 17:52 Max Krasnyansky
2002-12-19 23:08 Jean Tourrilhes
2002-12-19 23:23 ` Max Krasnyansky
2002-12-18 15:25 Max Krasnyansky
2002-12-19 16:05 ` Max Krasnyansky
2002-12-19 19:28 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-19 19:12 ` David S. Miller
2002-12-19 22:17 ` Max Krasnyansky
2002-12-21 6:54 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030217.194612.131926469.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).