From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:08:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:08:20 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:27544 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:08:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:01:24 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030228.170124.03146870.davem@redhat.com> To: shemminger@osdl.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Possible FIFO race in lock_sock() From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <1046467548.30194.258.camel@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> References: <1046467548.30194.258.camel@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Stephen Hemminger Date: 28 Feb 2003 13:25:50 -0800 Don't know what this impacts, perhaps out of order data on a pipe? There's a race to get the lock, who cares? If multiple people are playing with the socket, the exact pieces of data they happen to get is random unless the application does it's own locking.