From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 02:55:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 02:55:27 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:43156 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 28 Feb 2003 02:55:26 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:06:34 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Duncan Sands Cc: kernel@kolivas.org, dmccr@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: Rising io_load results Re: 2.5.63-mm1 Message-Id: <20030228000634.6d23a30c.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: <200302280846.04002.baldrick@wanadoo.fr> References: <20030227025900.1205425a.akpm@digeo.com> <20030227160656.40ebeb93.akpm@digeo.com> <200302281128.06840.kernel@kolivas.org> <200302280846.04002.baldrick@wanadoo.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Feb 2003 08:05:38.0648 (UTC) FILETIME=[2E1D9580:01C2DF00] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Duncan Sands wrote: > > Hi Con, are you sure this is not the same for 2.5.63? > I left 2.5.63 running over night (doing nothing but run > KDE), and in the morning it was swapping heavily. > About 200MB was swapped out and this did not reduce > with usage. According to top, 10% of memory was being > used by a Konsole with nothing in it (could be a memory > leak in Konsole). After half an hour I gave up - it was > too unusable. Maybe -mm1 just accentuates a problem > that is already there in 2.5.63. > Please take a snapshot of /proc/meminfo and /proc/slabinfo if anything like this happens.