On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:09:10AM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 07:02:00PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > My corrections file is up at http://www.kegel.com/spell-fix-dan1.txt
> > and the patch that produces is
> > http://www.kegel.com/linux-2.5.63-bk5-spell.patch.bz2.bin
> > The perl script took about an hour of 450MHz cpu time.
> > (Might be worth adding a quick path to detect and skip
> > files with none of the misspelled words.  Or just run
> > on a fast machine...)
> 
> OK. Next Take.
> 
> Changes this time:
> - A bug-fix for "--dir" (Would have checked all files)
> - Added a "fast-path" but this doesn't seem to make a difference
> 
> New options:
> - "--[no]fix" to fix (default) or only look for errors.
>   (This ignores the '[no]comment'-option and looks for all errors!)
> - "--[no]override" to override(default) the original file or create a
>   "<filename>.fixed"-file
> 
> 
> Anyone wants a "--[no]ask"-option?

Earlier or later the "missing-attachment"-thing must happen to anyone.
:-)




Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.