linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.63-mm2 + i/o schedulers with contest
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 17:02:10 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200303051702.10810.kernel@kolivas.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030304001032.034f60fa.akpm@digeo.com>

On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:10 pm, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
> > Mem_load result of AS being slower was just plain weird with the result
> > rising from 100 to 150 during testing.
>
> Maybe we should just swap computers or something?
>
> Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 145 user: 180 system: 18
> Finished mem_load: elapsed: 146 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 5000
> Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 135 user: 181 system: 17
> Finished mem_load: elapsed: 136 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800
> Finished compiling kernel: elapsed: 129 user: 181 system: 17
> Finished mem_load: elapsed: 130 user: 0 system: 2 loads: 4800
>
> 256MB, dual CPU, ext3/IDE.

Tried again - these were done as part of a full contest run, not just mem_load 
by itself, but these were the mem_load results:

98
128
135

then it oopsed (the one I posted earlier) and wasn't really usable after that 
point. Perhaps they're related. The mystery remains. I'll see what happens 
next mm release.

Con



      parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-05  5:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-04  2:54 [BENCHMARK] 2.5.63-mm2 + i/o schedulers with contest Con Kolivas
2003-03-04  4:18 ` Nick Piggin
2003-03-04  5:15   ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-04  5:26     ` Nick Piggin
2003-03-04  5:29       ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-04  8:10 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-04  8:20   ` Con Kolivas
2003-03-05  6:02   ` Con Kolivas [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200303051702.10810.kernel@kolivas.org \
    --to=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).