From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266210AbTCEX2S>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:28:18 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266948AbTCEX2S>; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:28:18 -0500
Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:62159 "EHLO
	mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S266210AbTCEX2R>;
	Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:28:17 -0500
From: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
To: Herman Oosthuysen <Herman@WirelessNetworksInc.com>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux vs Windows temperature anomaly
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:38:44 +1100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
References: <20030303123029.GC20929@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <p05210507ba8c20241329@[10.2.0.101]> <3E66842F.9020000@WirelessNetworksInc.com>
In-Reply-To: <3E66842F.9020000@WirelessNetworksInc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200303061038.44872.kernel@kolivas.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:11 am, Herman Oosthuysen wrote:
> Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> > We've been seeing a curious phenomenon on some PIII/ServerWorks CNB30-LE
> > systems.
> >
> > The systems fail at relatively low temperatures. While the failures are
> > So, the puzzle: what might account for temperature sensitivity, of all
> > things, under Linux 2.4.9-31 (RH 7.2), but not Win2K?
>
> Linux is more 'busy' than windoze and I have heard of boxes frying when
> running Linux.   The solution is to find a better motherboard
> manufacturer...

That doesn't make sense. His post said the temperature was 20 degrees lower 
when it failed.

Con