From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:48:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:48:17 -0500 Received: from packet.digeo.com ([12.110.80.53]:60293 "EHLO packet.digeo.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:48:17 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:58:45 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Miles Bader Cc: miles@lsi.nec.co.jp, zwane@linuxpower.ca, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oops: 2.5.64 check_obj_poison for 'size-64' Message-Id: <20030306235845.661fc4ab.akpm@digeo.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20030306222328.14b5929c.akpm@digeo.com> <20030306233517.68c922f9.akpm@digeo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Mar 2003 07:58:41.0288 (UTC) FILETIME=[5E3DC080:01C2E47F] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Miles Bader wrote: > > Andrew Morton writes: > > All the arch/*/kernel/irq.c implementations are distressingly similar. > > Andrey Panin did a bunch of work a while back to start consolidating the > > common code but it didn't quite get finished off. > > Do you remember what was unfinished about it? I tried his patch, and it > seemed to work fine; there were certainly still a few things left unmerged, > but it was a _huge_ improvement over the current state. Well I thought that many architectures were missing. But upon a re-read, I see that he allowed architectures to be cut over to GENERIC_IRQ one at a time. Seems fine. Although at some point we really do need to stop cleaning stuff up, defer such things into 2.7 and concentrate upon 2.5 bugs.