From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:14:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:14:27 -0500 Received: from c17870.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.248.224]:12764 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:14:25 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [BENCHMARK] 2.5.64-mm1 with contest Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:24:55 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: Andrew Morton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303070724.55565.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org contest results: no_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 4 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00 2.5.63-mm2 3 80 92.5 0.0 0.0 1.00 2.5.64 3 79 94.9 0.0 0.0 1.00 2.5.64-mm1 5 81 91.4 0.0 0.0 1.00 cacherun: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 4 76 97.4 0.0 0.0 0.96 2.5.63-mm2 3 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.94 2.5.64 3 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.95 2.5.64-mm1 5 75 98.7 0.0 0.0 0.93 process_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 4 92 81.5 28.2 15.2 1.16 2.5.63-mm2 3 92 80.4 29.3 16.3 1.15 2.5.64 3 92 81.5 30.0 16.3 1.16 2.5.64-mm1 5 94 78.7 30.2 18.1 1.16 ctar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 3 99 79.8 1.0 4.0 1.25 2.5.63-mm2 3 112 70.5 1.0 6.2 1.40 2.5.64 3 100 79.0 0.0 0.0 1.27 2.5.64-mm1 5 114 69.3 0.8 4.4 1.41 xtar_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 3 102 74.5 1.0 3.9 1.29 2.5.63-mm2 3 108 70.4 1.0 4.6 1.35 2.5.64 3 103 73.8 1.0 3.9 1.30 2.5.64-mm1 5 112 67.9 1.0 4.5 1.38 io_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 5 217 35.0 56.7 15.1 2.75 2.5.63-mm2 3 99 75.8 15.1 7.1 1.24 2.5.64 3 229 33.2 58.8 14.8 2.90 2.5.64-mm1 5 97 77.3 13.6 6.2 1.20 io_other: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 4 95 78.9 15.3 8.3 1.20 2.5.63-mm2 3 92 80.4 13.2 6.5 1.15 2.5.64 3 100 75.0 18.4 9.0 1.27 2.5.64-mm1 5 93 80.6 13.7 7.5 1.15 read_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 3 106 74.5 5.7 4.7 1.34 2.5.63-mm2 3 121 64.5 8.4 5.8 1.51 2.5.64 3 103 76.7 6.2 4.9 1.30 2.5.64-mm1 5 115 68.7 8.2 6.1 1.42 list_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 3 96 79.2 0.0 6.2 1.22 2.5.63-mm2 3 99 76.8 0.0 6.1 1.24 2.5.64 3 96 79.2 0.0 6.2 1.22 2.5.64-mm1 5 100 76.0 0.0 7.0 1.23 mem_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 3 104 75.0 57.7 1.9 1.32 2.5.63-mm2 3 132 59.1 90.3 2.3 1.65 2.5.64 3 105 74.3 58.3 1.9 1.33 2.5.64-mm1 5 111 70.3 63.2 1.8 1.37 dbench_load: Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio 2.5.63 4 194 39.2 2.0 38.7 2.46 2.5.63-mm2 3 236 32.2 2.7 43.2 2.95 2.5.64 3 222 34.2 2.3 38.7 2.81 2.5.64-mm1 5 231 32.9 2.6 42.0 2.85 Compared with 2.5.63-mm2 hardly any difference. Slightly better read load, slightly longer tar loads; the climbing mem_load problem has gone away...? Con