From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:18:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:18:24 -0500 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.31.123]:2061 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:18:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:28:55 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Tupshin Harper Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BitBucket: GPL-ed *notrademarkhere* clone Message-ID: <20030307112855.GE18420@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> References: <200303020011.QAA13450@adam.yggdrasil.com> <3E615C38.7030609@pobox.com> <20030302014039.GC1364@dualathlon.random> <3E616224.6040003@pobox.com> <3E623B9A.8050405@pobox.com> <20030306164146.GF2781@zaurus.ucw.cz> <3E688188.5060204@tupshin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E688188.5060204@tupshin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > >it*, then add my stuff. Ouch. svn is out > >because of licensing, cvs is not powerfull > > > Could you or somebody else explain this repeated claim that the > Subversion licensing is problematic? > > I don't have anything to do with the project, but a quick perusal of the > license doesn't reveal any problems. It's basically an Apache/BSD > license (pasted below for your reading pleasure). You snipped what you should not snip: I'd need to merge CSSC (GPL-ed) and svn (BSD with advertising). I may not do that. svn license is okay, but merging it with CSSC is not possible. Pavel -- Horseback riding is like software... ...vgf orggre jura vgf serr.