* WimMark I for 2.5.64
@ 2003-03-07 17:56 Joel Becker
2003-03-07 18:18 ` Stephen Wille Padnos
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Becker @ 2003-03-07 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
WimMark I report for 2.5.64
Runs: 1430.06 1194.90
WimMark I is a rough benchmark we have been running
here at Oracle against various kernels. Each run tests an OLTP
workload on the Oracle database with somewhat restrictive memory
conditions. This reduces in-memory buffering of data, allowing for
more I/O. The I/O is read and sync write, random and seek-laden.
The benchmark is called "WimMark I" because it has no
official standing and is only a relative benchmark useful for comparing
kernel changes. The benchmark is normalized an arbitrary kernel, which
scores 1000.0. All other numbers are relative to this.
The machine in question is a 4 way 700 MHz Xeon machine with 2GB
of RAM. CONFIG_HIGHMEM4GB is selected. The disk accessed for data is a
10K RPM U2W SCSI of similar vintage. Unless mentioned, all runs are
on this machine (variation in hardware would indeed change the
benchmark).
--
"I am working for the time when unqualified blacks, browns, and
women join the unqualified men in running our overnment."
- Sissy Farenthold
Joel Becker
Senior Member of Technical Staff
Oracle Corporation
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64
2003-03-07 17:56 WimMark I for 2.5.64 Joel Becker
@ 2003-03-07 18:18 ` Stephen Wille Padnos
2003-03-07 19:16 ` Joel Becker
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Wille Padnos @ 2003-03-07 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Becker; +Cc: linux-kernel
Interesting, but a couple of questions:
Which arbitrary kernel scores 1000.0?
Is the score very consistent on that kernel and machine? (what kind of
max/min scores do you get?)
- Steve
Joel Becker wrote:
>kernel changes. The benchmark is normalized an arbitrary kernel, which
>scores 1000.0. All other numbers are relative to this.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: WimMark I for 2.5.64
2003-03-07 18:18 ` Stephen Wille Padnos
@ 2003-03-07 19:16 ` Joel Becker
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joel Becker @ 2003-03-07 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Wille Padnos; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:18:50PM -0500, Stephen Wille Padnos wrote:
> Is the score very consistent on that kernel and machine? (what kind of
> max/min scores do you get?)
The scores for a particular kernel are pretty consistent.
That's the intent. Some kernels I'll have data for multiple runs, and
you can see the variation between runs.
Joel
--
"Conservative, n. A statesman who is enamoured of existing evils,
as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them
with others."
- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
Joel Becker
Senior Member of Technical Staff
Oracle Corporation
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-07 19:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-07 17:56 WimMark I for 2.5.64 Joel Becker
2003-03-07 18:18 ` Stephen Wille Padnos
2003-03-07 19:16 ` Joel Becker
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).