From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:21:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:21:49 -0500 Received: from 205-158-62-158.outblaze.com ([205.158.62.158]:12971 "HELO spf1.us.outblaze.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:21:48 -0500 Message-ID: <20030307223202.9244.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, ciarrocchi@linuxmail.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 06:32:02 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC] one line fix in arch/i386/Kconfig X-Originating-Ip: 193.76.202.244 X-Originating-Server: ws5-3.us4.outblaze.com Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Alan Cox > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 22:03, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > If I say that my cpu is not a PentiumIV why > > he bothers me about "check for P4 thermal throttling interrupt." ? > > > > This patch show that option only if you select that kind of CPU. > > > > Is it correct ? Does it makes sense ? > > We want people to be able to build a kernel which will run on many systems > but still use CPU specific features. Ah... ok I see the point, I could compile a kernel with PIII optimizations and then run it on a PIV. But it is a complication in the configuration process. Do we agree on that ? How about a config entry: "Leave only the option related to the CPU I selected" ? Ciao, Paolo -- ______________________________________________ http://www.linuxmail.org/ Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr Powered by Outblaze